Replies: 1 comment
-
Closing this for now. In the future perhaps I can create a version of the dialog that addresses this. For now I will use a different approach. Note to anyone reading, nothing here suggests form-dialog has a flaw, only that an additional dialog with additional properties would be a useful addition in the future. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I am using form-dialog boxes in various places to:
PROBLEM: Step 1 and 2 both grey out the entire page making it inaccessible to users and maintaining focus on either dialog box. However, in between step 1 and 2 above, the entire page becomes active (the dialog in step 1 disappears) allowing a user to click on the application interface before the step 2 alert box is triggered. If step 1 triggers actions that take a bit of time to complete (let's say a few seconds) and the dialog box disappears, it can be jarring for users to be clicking around the application interface only to suddenly have the step 2 alert box render notifying them the action has completed.
QUESTION: Is there a way to unify the dialog boxes in step 1 and step 2 and insert an intermediate dialog box that provides some sort of progress message while the entire app interface is greyed out?
Any suggestions on how to approach this would be great.
For anyone wondering about form-dialog, you can find sample code in 22-tutorial.lisp. Here is sample code for reference:
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions