Make `bun test` isolated

[erwinstone]

What is the problem this feature would solve?

Leaks across files.

Example:

// data.ts
export const data = {
  name: 'User',
}

// test1.test.ts
import { expect, test } from 'bun:test'
import { data } from './data'

data.name = 'Admin'

test('test-1', () => {
  expect(data).toEqual({
    name: 'Admin',
  })
})

// test2.test.ts
import { expect, test } from 'bun:test'
import { data } from './data'

test('test-2', () => {
  expect(data).toEqual({
    name: 'User',
  })
})

test2 will fail because the data has been modified in test1.

bun test v1.0.3 (25e69c71)

test/test1.test.ts:
✓ test-1 [0.08ms]

test/test2.test.ts:
1 | import { expect, test } from 'bun:test'
2 | import { data } from './data'
3 | 
4 | test('test-2', () => {
5 |   expect(data).toEqual({
      ^
error: expect(received).toEqual(expected)

  {
+   name: "Admin"
-   name: "User"
  }

- Expected  - 1
+ Received  + 1

In vitest and jest, both tests pass.

What is the feature you are proposing to solve the problem?

Isolated by default, but can be disabled using a parameter.
Ref: https://vitest.dev/config/isolate.html

What alternatives have you considered?

No response

[owenizedd]

I think this is important for production

[iliakan]

So bun tests are not isolated like in jest?

I've just read the docs and got the impression that they are... :/

[ChALkeR]

@iliakan https://npmjs.com/package/@exodus/test can run isolated tests on bun 🙃