Replies: 2 comments 3 replies
-
+1 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
are you sending the logs to DataDog over OTLP? if so, it sounds like a bug in the DataDog OTLP implementation, see: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
3 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
The logging data model states that timestamps should be an integer in nanoseconds. We use DataDog and this is problematic because their backend can't process these logs without quite a bit of customization (and without that customization, it drops them completely).
Could someone point me to the benefits/discussion of logging in ns as opposed to (what I think is more standard) seconds or milliseconds? Is there any hope to expand it to be
int64 | float
where floats are assumed to be seconds or something?Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions