Skip to content

[chore] Use pseudoversions for configoptional #13162

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

mx-psi
Copy link
Member

@mx-psi mx-psi commented Jun 5, 2025

Description

Uses valid pseudoversion so that contrib update-otel works

@mx-psi mx-psi requested a review from a team as a code owner June 5, 2025 12:27
@mx-psi mx-psi requested a review from songy23 June 5, 2025 12:27
@mx-psi mx-psi enabled auto-merge June 5, 2025 12:27
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 5, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 91.30%. Comparing base (e8ca607) to head (4d16ce8).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main   #13162   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.30%   91.30%           
=======================================
  Files         509      509           
  Lines       28740    28740           
=======================================
  Hits        26241    26241           
  Misses       1986     1986           
  Partials      513      513           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@mx-psi mx-psi added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 5, 2025
auto-merge was automatically disabled June 5, 2025 13:01

Pull Request is not mergeable

Merged via the queue into open-telemetry:main with commit efac6c7 Jun 5, 2025
53 of 57 checks passed
@mx-psi mx-psi deleted the mx-pso/pseudoversions-configoptional branch June 5, 2025 13:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants