Skip to content

[receiver/apachespark] Add apachespark scraping by application id #39627

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
NN--- opened this issue Apr 24, 2025 · 4 comments · May be fixed by #39936
Open

[receiver/apachespark] Add apachespark scraping by application id #39627

NN--- opened this issue Apr 24, 2025 · 4 comments · May be fixed by #39936

Comments

@NN---
Copy link

NN--- commented Apr 24, 2025

Component(s)

receive/apachespark

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

It is possible to scrape by application name but not by id.

Describe the solution you'd like

  apachespark:
    collection_interval: 60s
    endpoint: http://spark:4040
    application_ids:
      - "spark-1234"

Describe alternatives you've considered

No response

Additional context

No response

@NN--- NN--- added enhancement New feature or request needs triage New item requiring triage labels Apr 24, 2025
@NN--- NN--- changed the title Add apachespark scraping by application id [receiver/apachespark] Add apachespark scraping by application id Apr 25, 2025
@petern48
Copy link
Contributor

/label receiver/apachesparkreceiver

Copy link
Contributor

Pinging code owners for receiver/apachespark: @Caleb-Hurshman @mrsillydog. See Adding Labels via Comments if you do not have permissions to add labels yourself. For example, comment '/label priority:p2 -needs-triaged' to set the priority and remove the needs-triaged label.

@atoulme
Copy link
Contributor

atoulme commented May 7, 2025

@Caleb-Hurshman @mrsillydog please review this issue and accept or reject it, as a PR is now open for it.

@NN---
Copy link
Author

NN--- commented May 26, 2025

@Caleb-Hurshman Can you take a look please?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment