Skip to content

Commit 92e0ea4

Browse files
TrottMoLow
authored andcommitted
doc: remove broken link for keygen
Remove broken link to deprecated keygen element. Replacing the link with something to the relevant part of the HTML spec might be OK, but I don't think it's necessary. People who need to know will find it and everyone else should be discouraged from using this. Support for the keygen element was removed from Chrome in 2017 and removed from Firefox in 2019. We might consider deprecating and removing support ourselves, or at least marking the API as legacy. Refs: https://caniuse.com/?search=keygen PR-URL: #48176 Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]> Reviewed-By: Mohammed Keyvanzadeh <[email protected]>
1 parent fe15dae commit 92e0ea4

File tree

1 file changed

+1
-2
lines changed

1 file changed

+1
-2
lines changed

doc/api/crypto.md

Lines changed: 1 addition & 2 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ added: v0.11.8
7878
-->
7979

8080
SPKAC is a Certificate Signing Request mechanism originally implemented by
81-
Netscape and was specified formally as part of [HTML5's `keygen` element][].
81+
Netscape and was specified formally as part of HTML5's `keygen` element.
8282

8383
`<keygen>` is deprecated since [HTML 5.2][] and new projects
8484
should not use this element anymore.
@@ -6016,7 +6016,6 @@ See the [list of SSL OP Flags][] for details.
60166016
[Caveats]: #support-for-weak-or-compromised-algorithms
60176017
[Crypto constants]: #crypto-constants
60186018
[HTML 5.2]: https://www.w3.org/TR/html52/changes.html#features-removed
6019-
[HTML5's `keygen` element]: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Element/keygen
60206019
[JWK]: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7517
60216020
[NIST SP 800-131A]: https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/SpecialPublications/NIST.SP.800-131Ar1.pdf
60226021
[NIST SP 800-132]: https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/Legacy/SP/nistspecialpublication800-132.pdf

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)