diff --git a/doc/plan-for-new-modules-implementation.md b/doc/plan-for-new-modules-implementation.md
index b5666b4..d8d11b8 100644
--- a/doc/plan-for-new-modules-implementation.md
+++ b/doc/plan-for-new-modules-implementation.md
@@ -64,10 +64,14 @@ These changes are implemented in https://github.com/nodejs/ecmascript-modules/pu
   - `package.json` `module` field? `main` field?
   - Proposal: [“Package Exports” proposal](https://github.com/jkrems/proposal-pkg-exports) for bare module specifier resolution of ESM packages.
   - Proposal: [“File Specifier Resolution” proposal](https://github.com/GeoffreyBooth/node-import-file-specifier-resolution-proposal) mentions bare module specifier resolution of CommonJS packages; complements Package Exports proposal.
-  
+
 * Define semantics for determining when to load sources as CommonJS or ES module for both the top-level main (`node x.js`) and dependency loading.
   - Proposal: [“File Specifier Resolution” proposal](https://github.com/GeoffreyBooth/node-import-file-specifier-resolution-proposal) covers `import` statements of ESM files; and CommonJS files, package entry point and package deep imports.
 
+* Implement specification changes related to dynamic module records
+  - Proposal: ["Dynamic Modules Proposal"](https://github.com/nodejs/dynamic-modules/)
+  - We will need to reach consensus on appropriate behavior for [`export * from 'dynamic-module'`](https://github.com/nodejs/dynamic-modules/pull/11). If consensus cannot be reached, then this feature will be deferred to a later phase. The current behavior of throwing may also be reverted at a later time.
+
 ## Phase 3
 
 Phase 3 will tentatively focus on extensible loaders and deliver an environment that allows user-land experimentation.