test(#767): 100% code coverage #795
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Contributor
Author
|
The tests are failing in the CI because of |
Collaborator
|
Just waiting on this test https://github.com/visionmedia/supertest/actions/runs/3179015233 - I fixed codecov for us - TY for all this. Once they all pass I'll do a minor semver bump |
Contributor
Author
|
Thanks for the release, @titanism! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The changes in PR #767 dropped code coverage for: https://github.com/visionmedia/supertest/blob/e064b5ae71e1dfa3e1a74745fda527ac542e1878/lib/test.js#L287
This is because the
wrapAssertFnhas handled the error try-catch, leaving_assertFunction's catch unreachable.Added a test case to directly access
_assertFunctionfor code coverage purposes. Restored 100% code coverage.