Embabel vs. Dify
#496
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
Correct, Dify is a low code tool. Embabel is code-centric, for application developers. Embabel will likely add functionality for deploying natural language agents but we don't have any plans for a low code style visual development UI. Presently besides the README in this project my recent blogs are the best guide to Embabel's USP. I'll be publishing another blog on the overall vision in the next few days. We are working on better documentation overall. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Not sure whether my feeling is correct that Embabel seems to be a the JVM version as Dify? Although Dify is largely a low-code platform, while Embabel is coding-based. I would like to get further information on the goals of Embabel, if it is convenient, so that a better choice could be made between Embabel and others.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions