1.6 高阶函数 #104
Replies: 17 comments 4 replies
-
这一节要是没翻译,我可能就死在这了🥲 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
感谢翻译!这一节用中文看都断断续续看了几天,让人头大 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
感谢大佬们的翻译! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
感谢翻译!作为初学者还是不太理解匿名函数的用法,头大啊 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
1.6.3 python tutor 下面第三段: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
感谢大佬们的翻译,提一个小建议: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
醍醐灌顶了 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
牛顿法没有处理导数为0的情况 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
这一节好难,学1.1~1.5的时候只有frame困扰了自己一会儿,到了这节难度明显上来了 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
怎么第一章就上强度了 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
打卡 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
强烈建议这里如果有疑惑的地方就找GPT-o1讲一下自己的想法和理解,或者询问他的理解,效果很好 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
这一节有点小难 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
作为返回值的函数其实是叫“闭包”,起码chapgpt是这么说的,在lab2和homework2中都运用了1.6.4,反而1.6.5在slide中好像属于optional的内容,久违的泰勒展开,我都忘记了…… |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
看到大家都说难我就放心了 我还以为我是🐖 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
这里需要理解牛顿法的原理,教材讲的不是很好,容易云里雾里。 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
1.6 高阶函数
SICP Python 中文翻译
https://composingprograms.netlify.app/1/6
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions