Replies: 5 comments 3 replies
-
Yeah, any setting for this could go under the My memory on the changes is a bit hazy since this was all really early in the GTK4 / libadwaita port, but from what I recall There is a skeleton of this code path already for macOS, where we don't use a header bar at all and configure a menubar, but it's converted by GTK into the usual global menu for Mac apps (at the top of the screen) rather than actually being part of the window The main places to look would be Line 50 in 0f68928 and Line 342 in 0f68928 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Not having a way to change back to the old layout is just insane! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I sometimes think that I was old school or perhaps just plain "old" but after reading so many complaints I'm kinda relieved. Why oh why do you decide to change the UI, which is how people perceive you, so radically in one go! Dear developers : Please add an option to change the UI to "Classical View". Otherwise a significant number of users shall use the previous version (2.1 I suppose) or stop using this great application. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I have tried using the new UI but for me it appears to be a step backwards in almost every way. Actions I regularly use now take more clicks and more menu use than before. Actions which used to be easily discover-able have now been hidden in a hamburger menu. I will admit that I am a recent convert from Windows to Linux and was previously using Paint.NET - Pinta was an easy Linux compatible application for me to use as a Paint.NET replacement. With this change it feels like a large step backwards. For anyone else on Linux who uses the Flatpak - here are the commands I used to downgrade to 2.1.2 Here is the command I used to find the commit numbers to use in the above command (This just displays information) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
We have bug #781 for adding a menubar layout (with a pull request in progress), so I think we can close this discussion now to avoid duplicate threads. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I see many complaints about the new interface in Pinta 3.0.
How easy or hard would it be to abstract away the setting up of the interface so that users can choose between the modern one and the classical one (or at least something that has a similar layout)?
I am relatively new to the development of Pinta, so I didn't get to see what was changed in order to move from the classical to the modern interface.
Also, from my knowledge of the code, if this were implemented and the user wanted to switch, it would be easiest to save the his choice through the
SettingsManager
and then require him to restore the application. Would this be accurate?Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions