-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 89
Open
Description
I am using Linux with Swift 6.0.3
I have this example test file:
import Testing
import Foundation
@Test func example1() async throws {
#expect(true == false)
}
@Test func example2() async throws {
throw "some error happened"
}
@Test(arguments: [
"123"
])
func example3(input1: String) async throws {
throw "some error happened"
}
@Test(arguments: [
("123", "234")
])
func example4(input1: String, input2: String) async throws {
throw "some error happened"
}
extension String: @retroactive Error {
var localizedDescription: String {
self
}
}
This is the output I get with xcbeautify (latest commit, 6a3819d8183724c94418a7784e47e12a82e30c86
):
----- xcbeautify -----
Version: 2.27.0
----------------------
Building for debugging...
[16/16] Linking FoobarPackageTests.xctest
Build complete! (1.57s)
Test Suite 'All tests' started at 2025-03-10 16:47:57.215
Test Suite 'debug.xctest' started at 2025-03-10 16:47:57.216
Test Suite 'debug.xctest' passed at 2025-03-10 16:47:57.216
Test Suite 'All tests' passed at 2025-03-10 16:47:57.216
Test run started.
⚠ Test example2() recorded an issue at FoobarTests.swift:8:2: Caught error: some error happened
⚠ Test example3(input1:) recorded an issue with 1 argument(s)
⚠ Test example1() recorded an issue at FoobarTests.swift:5:5: Expectation failed: true == false
⚠ Test example4(input1:input2:) recorded an issue with 2 argument(s)
✖ example1() (0.001 seconds) 1 issue(s)
✖ example4(input1:input2:) (0.001 seconds) 1 issue(s)
✖ example2() (0.001 seconds) 1 issue(s)
✖ example3(input1:) (0.001 seconds) 1 issue(s)
Test run with 4 tests failed after 0.001 seconds with 4 issue(s)
This is the raw output:
Building for debugging...
[1/1] Write swift-version-60DE91C8E356094E.txt
Build complete! (0.24s)
Test Suite 'All tests' started at 2025-03-10 16:50:18.036
Test Suite 'debug.xctest' started at 2025-03-10 16:50:18.037
Test Suite 'debug.xctest' passed at 2025-03-10 16:50:18.037
Executed 0 tests, with 0 failures (0 unexpected) in 0.0 (0.0) seconds
Test Suite 'All tests' passed at 2025-03-10 16:50:18.037
Executed 0 tests, with 0 failures (0 unexpected) in 0.0 (0.0) seconds
◇ Test run started.
↳ Testing Library Version: 6.0.3 (18c42c19cac3faf)
◇ Test example4(input1:input2:) started.
◇ Test example2() started.
◇ Test example1() started.
◇ Test example3(input1:) started.
✘ Test example2() recorded an issue at FoobarTests.swift:8:2: Caught error: some error happened
◇ Passing 1 argument input1 → "123" to example3(input1:)
✘ Test example2() failed after 0.001 seconds with 1 issue.
◇ Passing 2 arguments input1 → "123", input2 → "234" to example4(input1:input2:)
✘ Test example3(input1:) recorded an issue with 1 argument input1 → "123" at FoobarTests.swift:12:2: Caught error: some error happened
✘ Test example3(input1:) failed after 0.001 seconds with 1 issue.
✘ Test example4(input1:input2:) recorded an issue with 2 arguments input1 → "123", input2 → "234" at FoobarTests.swift:19:2: Caught error: some error happened
✘ Test example4(input1:input2:) failed after 0.001 seconds with 1 issue.
✘ Test example1() recorded an issue at FoobarTests.swift:5:5: Expectation failed: true == false
✘ Test example1() failed after 0.001 seconds with 1 issue.
✘ Test run with 4 tests failed after 0.001 seconds with 4 issues.
Instead of Test example3(input1:) recorded an issue with 1 argument(s)
, I'd like to see something like Test example3(input1:) recorded an issue with input1 → "123" at FoobarTests.swift:12:2: Caught error: some error happened
Including that it has 1-2-etc. arguments is redundant as I can already see the argument count from the method signature.
nevillco, yveshanoulle, kaishin and mrtsamma
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
No labels